Faculty: Faculty of Engineering
Department: Surveying and Geomatics Engineering
Department: Surveying and Geomatics Engineering
Type of the workshop: National workshop
The workshop in brief:
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is one of the most popular decision-making tools utilized in various fields. The objectives of this workshop can be summarized as follows:
• To identify which options are most effective.
• Increasing the efficiency of the decision-making process.
• Acts as a means of communication.
• In addition to providing you with an ordered list of alternatives.
Participants: 21 participants.
Date and time: May 16th, 2023 at 3:00 pm
Place: Hall #314, Main Building | Tishk International University – Erbil
Place: Hall #314, Main Building | Tishk International University – Erbil
Session topics:
Session 1:
– Specify the decision criteria
Session 2:
– Algorithms: HAP, BHM and Entropy method
Session 1:
– Specify the decision criteria
Session 2:
– Algorithms: HAP, BHM and Entropy method
Presenters names and affiliations:
Dr. Tariq H. Karim (TIU)
Dr. Tariq H. Karim (TIU)
Outcome of the workshop:
The most outstanding outcome of this analysis can be described as shown below:
• To get acquainted with common methods of multi-criteria decision making
• To get acquainted with giving weights to different conflicting criteria
• To identify the differences between different algorithms for performing multi-criteria decision making
• How to handle ambiguity or vagueness in preference
• How to gauge people’s attitudes toward a topic by using Likert scale
• Differentiate between traditional and fuzzy MCDM
• Showing the importance of normalization in multi-criteria decision making
• To follow the steps for calculation and ranking of performance scores
• To check the validity of pair wise comparison by conducting consistency test.
The most outstanding outcome of this analysis can be described as shown below:
• To get acquainted with common methods of multi-criteria decision making
• To get acquainted with giving weights to different conflicting criteria
• To identify the differences between different algorithms for performing multi-criteria decision making
• How to handle ambiguity or vagueness in preference
• How to gauge people’s attitudes toward a topic by using Likert scale
• Differentiate between traditional and fuzzy MCDM
• Showing the importance of normalization in multi-criteria decision making
• To follow the steps for calculation and ranking of performance scores
• To check the validity of pair wise comparison by conducting consistency test.
